Legal Opinion
Allen v. Rose Park Pharmacy
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1951No. 7672PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Osbourne Allen was discharged as manager and pharmacist at the defendant’s drug store. This is an action for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of the following negative covenant in the contract of employment under which Allen was employed.
“Osbourne agrees that in the event of termination of this contract for any reason, * * * he shall not directly or indirectly compete, as an employee or principal in the operation of a drug store or pharmacy within a radius of two miles of this drug store for a period of five years thereafter.”
The trial court found that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Torrington Creamery, Inc. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Smithereen Co. v. RenfroeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- TruGreen Companies, L.L.C. v. Mower Bros., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.