Legal Opinion

Richards v. Baum

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1996No. 940160PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiffs Lamar and Lynne Richards brought this action seeking a decree quieting title and an order requiring defendants William and Maxine Baum to specifically perform a contract to sell certain real property located in Utah County. The Baums counterclaimed, seeking a decree quieting title in their favor. Following a bench trial, the court quieted title in favor of the Baums. The Richardses appeal.

In March 1994, the Richardses filed a notice of appeal. Pursuant to rule 6 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, they also filed a cost bond with the court. However, they did not…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Behrens v. Raleigh Hills Hospital, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  5. Burkett v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cedar Mountain Environmental, Inc. v. Tooele County Ex Rel. Tooele County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Navajo Nation v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. D.T. v. C.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Baker v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API