Legal Opinion

Dugan v. Jones

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1980No. 16334PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Dugans, the plaintiffs, brought this action to foreclose on a note and mortgage executed by the Joneses. Defendants filed a counterclaim and third-party complaint against the realtors, alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial .court, having refused defendants’ request for a jury, found for plaintiffs on their foreclosure action, dismissed .defendants’ counterclaim, and allowed them no recovery on their third-party complaint. This cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial on all issues in accordance with this…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. The Sill Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. In Re CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  3. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API