Lassiter v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to R. Ct. Fed. Cl. 56 (“RCFC”). Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging three causes of action, appeal from final decision of a contracting officer, breach of contract, and *266due process violation.1 Defendant moves for summary judgment, claiming that the default termination of plaintiffs contract was proper because plaintiff failed to perform contract services. Furthermore, defendant seeks compensation for its reprocurement costs. After careful consideration of both parties’ briefs and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Cascade Pacific International v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dcx, Inc. v. William J. Perry, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pinckney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- 5860 Chicago Ridge, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Trust Title Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Spodek v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012