Spodek v. United States Postal Service
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL D. STICKNEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following this Court’s decision on the “Motion and Brief to Alter or Amend Judgment, Motion to Amend Findings of Fact and Limited Motion for New Trial” (Doc. 158) of Plaintiffs J. Leonard Spodek and Rosalind Spodek (“Plaintiffs”), the Court enters the following Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court clarifies certain language that Plaintiffs have misinterpreted as a result of semantical misunderstandings. Additionally, the Court decides that Plaintiffs are entitled to an offset of the judgment against them,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Harry N. And Rose C. Forman v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.