Legal Opinion

Spodek v. United States Postal Service

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 9, 2012No. 3:07-CV-1888-BFPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL D. STICKNEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Following this Court’s decision on the “Motion and Brief to Alter or Amend Judgment, Motion to Amend Findings of Fact and Limited Motion for New Trial” (Doc. 158) of Plaintiffs J. Leonard Spodek and Rosalind Spodek (“Plaintiffs”), the Court enters the following Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court clarifies certain language that Plaintiffs have misinterpreted as a result of semantical misunderstandings. Additionally, the Court decides that Plaintiffs are entitled to an offset of the judgment against them,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Harry N. And Rose C. Forman v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API