Legal Opinion
Dcx, Inc. v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 16, 1996No. 20-1624PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
DCX, Inc., appeals a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals upholding the government’s termination of a contract for default. We affirm.
I
On April 1, 1988, the Defense Logistics Agency awarded a contract to DCX for light sets to be used in medical tents. The contract required DCX to perform a series of tests on the first light set that DCX manufactured under the contract and to supply the government with a First Article Test Report. The test report was due on June 30, 1988, and delivery of the light sets was required to begin by July 18,1988. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Darwin Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Fairfield Scientific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Switlik Parachute Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
3Cited by32 opinions
- Morganti National, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- General Injectables & Vaccines, Inc. v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- District of Columbia v. Kora & Williams Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.