Legal Opinion
Armour of America v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 10, 2011No. 04-1731CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The government terminated plaintiff Armour of America’s contract with the United States Navy for default, based on the alleged *729failure by Armour of America to make progress in accordance with the terms of the contract, thereby endangering performance of the contract. The Navy completed the contract with a reproeurement contractor, ArmorWorks, also the intervenor in this ease.2 Armour of America filed a complaint in this court and, then, an amended complaint, which alleges a breach of contract based on bad faith and abuse of discretion (Count I), and a breach of the…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Glenn Defense Marine (Asia) PTE, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- 5860 Chicago Ridge, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Trust Title Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.