Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 28, 2009No. 06-803 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge.

I. Procedural Background

This ease is before the court following a trial on a claim by plaintiff, Wonderlyn Lorraine Bell Pinckney (Ms. Pinckney or plaintiff), for breach of contract against the government (government or United States or defendant). Trial was conducted in Charleston, South Carolina on Thursday, January 22, 2009 and Friday, January 23, 2009. Pinck-ney Trial Transcript (Tr.) passim. The court heard testimony from eight witnesses1 and *493received nine exhibits in trial. Tr. passim. In addition, eighteen exhibits were admitted prior to trial pursuant to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anselma Crossing, L.P. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Pinckney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Scott Timber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API