Legal Opinion

Johnson & Higgins of Alaska Inc. v. Blomfield

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1995No. S-5773PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Blomfields owned and managed an office building, which they leased to the State of Alaska, Department of Labor (State). State employees became ill, apparently from a contaminant in the ventilation system. The Blomfields so informed their insurance agent, an employee of Johnson & Higgins of Alaska (J & H). The agent assured the Blomfields that any loss they suffered as a result of the problem was covered by an “all risk” insurance policy he had obtained for them from American & Foreign Insurance Company (A & F). When a demand was made on A & F,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Metro Allied Insurance Agency, Inc. v. LinTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Era Aviation, Inc. v. LindforsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cigna Property & Casualty Companies v. ZeitlerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API