Legal Opinion

Dura Corp. v. Harned

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1985No. S-445PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case involves a personal injury claim by Charles Harned against Dura Corporation, a manufacturer of portable air tanks, based on strict liability in tort and negligence. At the close of evidence, the superi- or court directed verdicts against the manufacturer on the issues of negligence per se, defective product, superseding cause, comparative negligence and proximate cause. The jury then found that Dura manufactured the air tank and assessed damages. Dura appeals the directed verdicts on superseding cause, comparative negligence, and proximate cause, and also…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API