Legal Opinion
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1980No. 3092, 3135PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
CONNOR, Justice.
In our original opinion in this case, Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, 594 P.2d 38, 49 (Alaska 1979), we reversed and remanded for a new trial as to both compensatory damages and punitive damages. We also held that “if punitive damages are awarded at a second trial, on essentially the same evidence as that presented in the first trial, they should not exceed $250,000.” 594 P.2d at 49.
*623We have received several briefs on rehearing. After considering these further arguments of the parties, we have decided to modify our previous opinion and holdings in certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- A. UBERTI & C. v. Leonardo in & for PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.