Legal Opinion

Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2009No. S155129PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

This case involves an insurance policy that covers injury resulting from “an accident.” After an assault and battery by the insured, the injured party sued the insured, alleging that the insured had acted under the unreasonable belief of having to defend himself, an act that according to the injured party fell within the policy’s coverage of “an accident.” Does the insurance company have a duty to defend that action? The answer is “no.” We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which had reversed the trial court.

*306I

Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Abouzaid v. Mansard Gardens Associates, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API