Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2007No. Docket 272453PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

In this premises-liability action, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants. We affirm.

While plaintiff was shopping, he slipped on crushed green grapes or green grape residue on the floor of defendants’ grocery store. Plaintiff began to fall, reached for his shopping cart, and sustained injuries. The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10), ruling that the slipping hazard posed by the crushed grapes or grape residue was open and obvious as a matter of law.

We review de novo a trial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Innovative Adult Foster Care, Inc v. RaginMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Rataj v. City of RomulusMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Quinto v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Grimes v. Van Hook-WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Compau v. Pioneer Resource Company, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API