Legal Opinion
Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1996No. 99057, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 460 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
In this case, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs claim pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.-, MSA 3.548(101) et seq., on defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We hold that the trial court properly found that plaintiff had failed to sufficiently support a prima facie case of hostile work environment with documentary evidence and therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, which upheld the findings of the trial court.
*360FACTS
Plaintiff Elena Quinto was employed by defendant Cross and Peters Company, the maker of Better Made Potato Chips, for eighteen years.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- McCART v. J WALTER THOMPSON USA, INCMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Apfelblat v. National Bank Wyandotte-TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by460 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
455 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.