Legal Opinion

Placek v. City of Sterling Heights

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1979No. 59710, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 366 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this case we consider whether to adopt a rule of comparative negligence in Michigan. The factual circumstances involve a close question of the negligence of one or both of two drivers: driver Placek, a layperson who was traveling on a through street and the other, Police Officer Ernst on an emergency run traveling past a stop sign. We do not sit as trier of fact as to whether either, neither or both of these drivers were negligent.

We hold, in the interest of justice for all litigants in this state, that the doctrine of comparative negligence hereby replaces the doctrine of contributory…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by366 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

361 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API