Legal Opinion

Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2001No. Docket 112575PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This premises liability action arises from a fall in a parking lot possessed by defendant. Plaintiff apparently fell after stepping in a pothole in the parking lot. The circuit court granted summary disposition in favor of defendant, but the Court of Appeals reversed, rejecting defendant’s position that plaintiff’s claim was barred by the “open and obvious danger” doctrine. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the circuit court. The pothole was open and obvious, and plaintiff has not provided evidence of special aspects of the condition to justify…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Singerman v. Municipal Service Bureau, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hoffner v. LanctoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Shelton v. Kentucky Easter Seals Society, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Buhalis v. Trinity Continuing Care ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Benton v. Dart Properties Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API