Legal Opinion

People v. Rosen

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1938No. Crim. 4125PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was charged, by information with having committed the crime of robbery by feloniously'taking from one Paul W. Whitcomb the sum of $198, accomplished by means of force and fear. The defendant was also charged with having been armed at the time with a deadly weapon. He was tried on his plea of not guilty and convicted of robbery in the first degree. He appealed from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

This is a case where admittedly the defendant is guilty of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. The question is whether…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. KeeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. State v. BrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. ViceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API