Legal Opinion
State v. Marley
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1973No. 5234PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ABE, J.
The defendants-appellants (hereafter referred to as defendants) in this case — Susan M. Atherton, Noble L. Beck, Bette G. Johnson, Dorothy N. Katz, Gerard A. LePage, Rodney J. Marley, James A. Walkley, and John J. Witeck — were convicted of criminal trespass on the premises of the Honolulu office of the Honeywell corporation. The convictions, following a jury trial in Circuit Court on October 5, 6, 7 and 8, 1971, resulted in sentences of fine (in all instances partially suspended) and of jail (in all instances suspended).
The significant facts are as follows: On…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- SHAD Alliance v. Smith Haven MallNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- United States v. Victor Manuel Meraz-ValetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.