People v. Tufunga
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
The claim-of-right defense provides that a defendant’s good faith belief, even if mistakenly held, that he has a right or claim to property he takes from another negates the felonious intent necessary for conviction of theft or robbery. At common law, a claim of right was recognized as a defense to larceny because it was deemed to negate the animus furandi, or intent to steal, of that offense. (See 4 Blackstone, Commentaries 230 (Blackstone).) Since robbery was viewed as an aggravated form of larceny, it was likewise subject to the same claim-of-right defense. (Id. at pp.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. DemetruliasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.