Legal Opinion

People v. Ammerman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1897No. Crim. No. 250PublishedCited by 68 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. F. Crawford, Judge. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Defendant was informed against for the crime of robbery by forcibly taking from the person of one Bichard Johnson thirty-eight dollars, lawful money of the United States, and was convicted and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Defendant pleaded former acquittal, once in jeopardy and not guilty.

An information against defendant for the crime of robbery involving the same transaction had previously been filed, and under it defendant was arraigned and pleaded not guilty; a jury was impaneled, the information was read and the plea stated. After the jury was sworn, and before any…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. People v. ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. People v. PartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. ViceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API