Legal Opinion

Town of Martinez v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This application for a writ of mandate was presented to this court upon an agreed statement of facts. The petitioner makes the application under the provisions of sections 1138 to 1140, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure, which relate to the submission of controversies which might be the subject of a civil action to courts which would have jurisdiction of such action upon an agreed state ment of facts. The petitioner herein, the Town of Martinez, a municipal corporation, seeks to compel the respondent as town clerk of said Town of Martinez to countersign certain municipal bonds which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cleveland v. City Council of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  5. Omaha National Bank v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. City of San Diego v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. City of Crescent City v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. City of Redding v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API