Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mauch

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1901No. Crim. No. 842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

William Mauch was convicted in the police court of the city of Marysville upon a charge of cruelty to an animal, committed, as the complaint charged, by willfully and unlawfully cruelly beating and torturing a certain dog named “Sport,” etc.

It is claimed that his imprisonment upon said conviction is unlawful because" the complaint fails to charge that the act was malicious, and that malice is an essential ingredient of the crime. It is true that the beating and torturing must be ma licious, in order to constitute the offense (Pen. Code, sec. 597), but willful and unlawful cruelty is malice.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quigg v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
  3. People v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. City of Marysville v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API