Legal Opinion

People v. Farley

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1973No. 24051PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

33 Cal.App.3d 1 (1973)

109 Cal. Rptr. 59

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ROBERT E. FARLEY, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. 24051.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Joaquin.

May 1, 1973.

COUNSEL

Darrah, Dalton & Rule for Defendant and Appellant.

John Phillips, District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

DOZIER, P.J.

The defendant was charged with violating section 597 of the Penal Code in that he subjected certain horses to "needless suffering and unnecessary cruelty." At the beginning of the trial the prosecutor and defense counsel…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. BrianAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  3. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. RiveraSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API