Legal Opinion

City of Marysville v. County of Yuba

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1905No. 49PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action to recover back certain moneys collected on fines imposed by the police judge of the police court of plaintiff and alleged to have been paid over to defendant for the use and benefit of plaintiff.

Defendant demurred to the complaint for insufficiency of facts, and the court sustained the demurrer on this ground alone. Other grounds are stated in the demurrer, but as they are not mentioned in respondent’s brief, they will not be noticed. Plaintiff failing to amend its complaint, judgment passed for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

It was alleged in the complaint that there existed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ex Parte MauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Brewing Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. State ex rel. Mueller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API