Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Alvarado

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2005No. D043471Published

1Concurrence

McINTYRE, J., Concurring.

Although I agree with the result reached by the majority, I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a Penal Code section 597, subdivision (a) offense is a general intent crime. (All statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Section 597, subdivision (a) originally made it a crime to “maliciously” maim, mutilate, torture, wound or kill a living animal. In applying this statute, the courts deemed “malice” to refer to the intent to do a wrongful act. (People v. Dunn (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 418, 420-421 [114 Cal.Rptr. 164]; see Ex parte…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API