People v. Farley
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOZIER, P. J.
The defendant was charged with violating section 597 of the Penal Code in that he subjected certain horses to “needless suffering *Supp. 3and unnecessary cruelty.” At the beginning of the trial the prosecutor and defense counsel stipulated that the “cruelty” that would properly be involved in the trial was the failure to provide the animals with proper feed and water.
Evidence was introduced from lay witnesses that there was a lack of proper food and water. Two veterinarians testified as to the physical condition of the animals. Neither was able to say that any animals died…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. BrianAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- People v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. Adams CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.