Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. Crowder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1921No. 10150PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from County Court, McClain County; Geo. F. Johnson, Judge. Proceedings 'by - the State to forfeit automobile used to convey intoxicating liquors, in which Elmo Hoskins, by Nora G. Hoskins, guardian, intervened as owner. Judgment of forfeiture, and intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of McClain county, Oklahoma, wherein one Buick Light Six, 1917 model,- automobile was ordered confiscated and forfeited to the state of Oklahoma, on the grounds that the same was used in conveying intoxicating liquors contrary to the provisions of the law.

The evidence adduced at the trial in the lower court shows, in substance, that, on the 12th day of January, 1918, Nora G. Hoskins, as guardian for her minor son, Elmo Hoskins, purchased the ear in controversy for hf"’ ward. After the urehase of the car, the guardian arranged with one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Peavler v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. One Cadillac Automobile, 1918 Model v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Moss v. Summit CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. One Certain Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Gmac v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API