Legal Opinion
Gmac v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 22, 1935No. 22948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This cause is in this court on an appeal from the judgment of the county court of Pushmataha county against the intervener therein, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, a corporation, adjudging a certain Oakland coupé automobile to be forfeited under the provisions of section 1, c. 188, Session Laws 1917, being section 2646, O. S. 1931. Hereinafter we will refer to the parties as the intervener and the state of Oklahoma.
The action was commenced in the county court of Pushmataha county, Okla., by the filing of an information by the county attorney of said county designating the state of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Peavler v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Boles v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ponder v. State Ex Rel. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Fehir v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Prater v. 2010 Toyota Corolla, VIN 1NXBU4EE4AZ313776Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Oklahoma Maytag Co. v. WorthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- STATE ex rel. PRATER v. 2010 TOYOTA COROLLACourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015