Legal Opinion
Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 31, 1921No. 9915PublishedCited by 56 opinions
Error from District Court, Jefferson County ; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of Ben E. Saye, County Attorney, to forfeit One Hudson Super-Six Automobile; Lester Keeter intervening as claimant. Judgment for State forfeiting automobile, and claimant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
This action was instituted in the county court of Jefferson county by the county attorney of said county on the 28th day of October, 1917, to forfeit to the state of Oklahoma one “Hudson Super-Six Automobile.” The material part of the petition filed in this proceeding is as follows, to wit:
“That on the 26th day of October, 1917, the said Hugh Treadwell and George Allman, seized and took into their possession and custody one Hudson Super-Six Automobile, No. —•; that at the time it was so seized it was being used by one Lester Keeter, herein defendant, to convey intoxicating liquor into…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- A.E. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Wilson v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.