Legal Opinion

State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring Car

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1926PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by Nona B. Heffling, from a decree rendered by the Circuit Court for Jackson County, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 29, Laws of 1923, by the terms of which a Studebaker car belonging to her was forfeited to the state because of an alleged act of her husband in transporting on his person therein a bottle of intoxicating liquor.

There was evidence tending to show, that prior to the seizure of the car, the husband of appellant, while engaged in driving the car, but not in her presence, had carried on his person a bottle of intoxicating liquor, for which he had been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AnthonyOregon Supreme Court · 1946

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API