Peavler v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; H. L. Standeven, Judge. Proceedings by the State to forfeit automobile used in transportation of intoxicating liquor. Intervention by H. C. Peavler, owner of the car, and the Charles Lukins Auto Company, mortgagee. Judgment of forfeiture, and interveners bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Tulsa county, forfeiting one Cadillac automobile to the state for the reason the same was being used in violation of law, to wit, conveying intoxicating liquor. The record discloses that S. Pogue was driving the car and was conveying some four one-half pints of whisky in said ear through the streets of the city of Tulsa. H. C. Peavler intervened in the action, claiming title to the car, alleging that he was in the taxicab business and that Pogue was in his employ, and if Pogue was conveying liquor in said automobile, it was without his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Boles v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- One Buick Car v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Doc & Bill Furniture Co. v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Gmac v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- One Ford Car v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.