One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Payne County; Wilberforce Jones, Judge. Forfeiture proceedings against One Hudson Super-Six Automobile, No. 39527, in which W. D. Peyton, as owner, and the First National Bank of Cushing, as mortgagee, intervened. From judgment of forfeiture to State, the latter bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
On the 27th day of August, 1917, in the county court of Payne county, in a libel proceeding against one Hudson Super-Six Automobile, No. 39527, judgment was rendered forfeiting said vehicle to the state, because of its use in transporting intoxicating liquors in violation of law. The own er of the automobile, one W. D. Peyton, who used it in the illegal transportation of liquor, and the First National Bank of Cushing, which held a chattel mortgage on said machine, intervened and contested the public’s right to forfeit the same, and from the aforesaid judgment they have lodged in this court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. People ex rel. KoernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- United States v. One Black HorseDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Foster v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Peavler v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- J. S. Bryan & Sons v. VernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.