Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1987No. L.A. 32233PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court adopted the findings of the hearing referee and unanimously recommended that petitioner Michael Bernard Rosenthal be disbarred. Petitioner claims that disbarment is excessive for two reasons: (1) he did not have a fair opportunity to present a strong defense at the hearing, and (2) extrinsic mitigating evidence demonstrates that he is not a danger to the public. We find these contentions to be without merit and adopt the recommended discipline.

Stipulation

Petitioner does not dispute that he committed the offenses underlying the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Tenner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Lydon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API