Rosenthal v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
The Review Department of the State Bar Court adopted the findings of the hearing referee and unanimously recommended that petitioner Michael Bernard Rosenthal be disbarred. Petitioner claims that disbarment is excessive for two reasons: (1) he did not have a fair opportunity to present a strong defense at the hearing, and (2) extrinsic mitigating evidence demonstrates that he is not a danger to the public. We find these contentions to be without merit and adopt the recommended discipline.
Stipulation
Petitioner does not dispute that he committed the offenses underlying the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Tenner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Lydon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.