Legal Opinion

Waysman v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1986No. L.A. 32087PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this proceeding, we review the recommendation of the State Bar of California that petitioner William Waysman be suspended from the practice of law for six months, that execution of suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be placed on probation for one year on conditions which include no actual suspension but require, among other things, that he make restitution and abstain from alcohol.

Petitioner is charged with a single incident of misconduct: commingling and misappropriating $24,000 in client funds. He has no prior record of discipline. Petitioner was admitted to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re NadrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API