Legal Opinion

Tarver v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1984No. S.F. 24697PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review a recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that Robert A. Tarver, petitioner, be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of California. In three separate instances, petitioner was found, inter alia, to have commingled and misappropriated client funds, signed a settlement draft and release without authorization, and charged an unconscionable fee. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6067, 6068 and 6103.) We will adopt the review department’s recommendation.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1951 and practiced law from that date until his interim…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Saleeby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re SeveroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Trousil v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API