Legal Opinion
Tenner v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1980No. L.A. 31252PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
We review the recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (the board) in two consolidated matters. Petitioner has been the subject of previous discipline (Tenner v. State Bar (1978) 20 Cal.3d 878 [144 Cal.Rptr. 609, 576 P.2d 92]) in which proceeding we approved the stay of a three-year suspension from the practice of law upon his compliance with several enumerated conditions.
The Present Offenses
In the matters presently before us petitioner does not dispute the findings of the board, the sole issue being the nature of appropriate discipline to be imposed.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re the Discipline of WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Inniss v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Fitzpatrick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.