Legal Opinion

Estrada v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2015No. 7062 S-15434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION -

A statewide regulation authorizés the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (the Department) to specify how many fish may be taken annually under a subsistence fishing permit, Four Angoon: fishermen challenged this regulation on various grounds after they were charged with taking more salmon than their permits allowed. The district court agreed with their challerige and dismissed the charges, The court of appeals reversed. We conclude that these harvest limits are regulations that must comply 'with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Because the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. v. NoahAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. Sababu HodariAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Alaska Public Defender Agency v. Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. AVCG, LLC v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Cox v. Estate of Steve CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API