Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Baker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2016No. 7143 S-15971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Statute 13.12.502(b) provides that a testamentary instrument will be “valid as a holographic will, whether or not witnessed, if the 'signature and material portions of the document are in the testator’s handwriting.” Before us is a purported holographic will, written totally in the decedent’s handwriting, with instructions to distribute the decedent’s estate at death. The sole question on appeal is whether the decedent’s handwritten name at the beginning of the document is a “signature” as contemplated by AS 13.12.602(b). This is an issue of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Adams v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  4. Burton v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. Estate of Steve CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Hester v. LandauAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of Fe Perez Abad, In the Matter of the Estate of Sandra Lee BoatnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Hester v. LandauAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In the Matter of the Estate of Janice V. EvensenAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API