Legal Opinion

Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. v. Noah

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1997No. S-7326PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. (KBW) seeks to invalidate the decision of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to accept applications for aquatic farming in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska. KBW also asks this court to hold that DNR’s regulations setting forth criteria for issuing aquatic farmsite permits are legally insufficient and, contrary to the superior court’s ruling, that KBW is a public interest litigant. We reverse DNR’s decision to accept applications for aquatic farming in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska on the ground that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. SchnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Gwich'in Steering Committee v. State, Office of the GovernorAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Alaska Center for the Environment v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API