Cox v. Estate of Steve Cooper
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STOWERS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the interpretation of Alaska's usury statute, AS 45.45.010. The question on appeal is whether the statute provides for a maximum interest rate on contract or loan commitments in which the principal amount exceeds $25,000. William C. Cox argues that the statute provides for a maximum interest rate of 10.5% on all loans in which the principal exceeds $25,000. The Estate of Steve Cooper and Dorothy Cooper (collectively "the Coopers") 1 argue that parties may contract for any interest rate if the principal of the contract or loan commitment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Kaiser v. SakataAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Paul Arthur BentleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
- Kimberly Wallace Goodwin, individually and as the natural parent of Jackson Wallace Goodwin and Jonathon Goodwin, individually and as the parent of Jackson Wallace Goodwin v. Mat-Su Midwifery, Inc., Judi Davidson, and Darcy Lucey, Mat-Su Midwifery, Inc., Judi Davidson, and Darcy Lucey v. Kimberly Wallace Goodwin, Individually and as the Natural Parent of Jackson Wallace Goodwin and Jonathon Goodwin, Individually and as the Parent of Jackson Wallace GoodwinAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
- Victoria W. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2026