Legal Opinion

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental Conservation

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2006No. S-12029PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation billed Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. for costs the department incurred defending against Alyeska's administrative challenge of an air quality control permit. Although federal law requires the department to recover all permit-related costs from industry, Alyeska argues that state law and due process do not allow the department to recover these costs directly from the appealing permit holder. Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Smart v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Friends of Willow Lake, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Division of Aviation & AirportsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API