Legal Opinion

Harris v. Phœnix Accident & Sick Benefit Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1907No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Wiest, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Sanford Harris against tbe Phoenix Accident & Sick Benefit Association on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The plaintiff, a painter by trade, obtained on May 7, 1904, a certificate of membership in the defendant association. May 19, 1904, he received an injury which he contends gave him a claim against the defendant. This suit was brought to enforce that claim.* From a judgment in his favor, the case is brought here by writ of error.

Assignments of error in relation to the remarks of counsel, the admission of testimony, and certain portions of the charge, have been examined, but we deem it unnecessary to discuss them. The following conditions are to be found in the certificate of membership:

Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Klass v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Peck v. German Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Law v. New England Mutual Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Parsons v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Harvey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  5. Roberson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API