Legal Opinion

Law v. New England Mutual Accident Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assimpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The-facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDurand, J.

This suit is brought upon a certificate of insurance issued by tbe defendant company to tbe plaintiff, by tbe terms of wbicb it agreed to pay him certain, specified sums of money.in case be suffered personal bodily-injuries of a certain character, mentioned in tbe certificate,, at any time during its life.

During tbe life of tbe certificate or policy, and on April 9, 1890, tbe plaintiff was injured to an extent wbicb partially prevented him from practicing bis profession as-a physician for a period of about four weeks. Tbe plaintiff notified tbe defendant of tbe accident, wbicb made am *267examinat…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Kendall v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Barry & Finan Lumber Co. v. Citizens' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API