Legal Opinion

Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Wilber, J., Assumpsit by Henry Turner against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York on a policy of accident insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

This is an action to recover a weekly indemnity under an accident policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff on the 8th day of January, 1888, and subsequently renewed from year to year, the last renewal certificate covering a period from January 8, 1894, to January 8, 1895. On February 10, 1894, while the plaintiff was carrying wood on a wheelbarrow, he slipped and fell, dislocating his right shoulder. He claims an indemnity under the policy for a total disability for a period of 10 weeks. At the time the policy was issued, and at the time of the accident, the plaintiff was engaged in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  5. Lyon v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Essex House v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
  5. North American Accident Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API