Legal Opinion

Peck v. German Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Wexford. (Aldricb. J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action upon a fire insurance policy containing the following provision:

“No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be snstainable in any court of law or -equitv unless commenced within 12 months next after the fire.”

There is no testimony showing any waiver of this provision. On the contrary, the defendant promptly denied liability, and returned the proofs of loss immediately upon their being furnished. The suit cannot therefore be maintained unless it was in -fact commenced within one year from the time of the fire. Steele v. Insurance Co., 93 Mich. 81;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ross v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Hancock v. RitchieIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Howell v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hekla Insurance v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Gunn v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Home Savings Bank v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Barry & Finan Lumber Co. v. Citizens' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Colling v. McGregorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API