Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 8, 1988No. Civ. 87 73469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This is an action for sickness and accident benefits allegedly due and owing to Plaintiff. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. A hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment was held on January 11, 1988. This memorandum sets forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the Court bases its grant of summary judgment for the Defendant.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Undisputedly, Defendant issued to General Motors (“GM”) a Group Insurance Plan for Hourly Workers (“GM Plan”)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nolan v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  4. Bashans v. Metro Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Harris v. Phœnix Accident & Sick Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Successor to Claims of First Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Bomis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Cage v. General Motors Defined Benefit Salaried PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  4. Yingling v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. RTC v. Hartford AccidentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API