Legal Opinion

Braden v. Gulf Coast Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1923No. 11145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This action, was instituted by ■the defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, Jess Braden, sole trader under the name of Braden* Lumber Company, for balance due in the sum of $236.80 for lumber sold by the plaintiff and purchased by the defendant. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Thereafter, the defendant filed a demurrer to plain tiff’s petition, which was later withdrawn, and his answer was filed, in •which he admitted that he purchased the lumber of plaintiff as set forth in plaintiff’s petition,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vassear v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Johnson v. Acme Harvesting MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Vowell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Brown v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Looney v. County Election Board of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Meyer v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Owens v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. State Bank of Dakoma v. WeaberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API