Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Acme Harvesting MacH. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1909No. 68PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Error from District Court, Payne County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Acme Harvesting Machine Company against E. N. Johnson. Judgment for plaintifi, and defendant brings error. citing : Royal Fraternal Union v. Crosier, 70 Kan. 85; Sheldon v. Middleton, 10 Iowa, 17.
1Opinion of the CourtDunN, J.
The Acme Harvesting Machine Company on the 12th day of January, 1907, filed its bill of particulars in the probate court of Pa3fne county, against E. N. Johnson, praying judgment on the following note: . ■
“$20.00. Stillwater, Aug. 26, 1904. On or before the 1st day of October, 1905, for value received, I promise to pay to the Acme Harvester Company (terminal station) Peoria. Illinois, at Stillwater, the sum of twenty dollars, with interest until paid at 6 percent. from date until due, ten per cent, per annum thereafter until paid. It is expressly agreed that the title to the Acme mower…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vassear v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Neal v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Royal Fraternal Union v. CrosierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
3Cited by22 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hight v. McCullochTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Braden v. Gulf Coast Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State Bank of Dakoma v. WeaberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.