Legal Opinion

Owens v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1928No. 17269PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county in September, 1924, by O: B. Mothersead, Bank Commissioner, as plaintiff, against O. O. Owens, defendant.' The parties, usually, will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The action was for recovery on a certain promissory note which defendant had executed to the First State Bank of Bristow on December 7, 1923, in the sum of $7,500. The petition was in regular form, and the defendant seasonably filed his answer and cross-petition to the petition; and thereafter filed his second amended answer, set-off and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Lazarus v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Smith v. McCarthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Djowharzadeh v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of NormanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Emery v. VillinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Lewis v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Seekatz v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Berg v. WillibeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API