Legal Opinion

Etchas v. Orena

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1898No. L. A. No. 499PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from an order granting a new trial. W. S. Day, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

When this cause was called for trial in the superior court the plaintiff mqved for judgment on the pleadings in her favor, and, the court having denied her motion, she excepted to the ruling. The cause was thereupon tried before a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the *271sum of fifteen hundred dollars. The defendant moved for a new trial, upon the ground, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict, and, after hearing the motion, the court made an order granting a new trial upon •that ground, unless the plaintiff should before a certain day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Read v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pierce v. BirkholmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Joyce v. RubinIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Raphael Weill & Co. v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ingraham v. WeidlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API